EPI-WIKI

A Best Practice Guide for implementing Liberal Arts and Sciences at European Higher Education Institutions, offered to you by EPICUR European University Alliance

Tabs

Functions

Learning Aims and Educational Philosophy

How to approach aspects of learning and teaching?
Defining the learning aims and your educational philosophy
When establishing a LAS programme you need to create a framework against which you determine and benchmark your own programme-specific learning outcomes. It is highly recommended that with your learning outcomes you clearly, in active verbs, describe what the students should learn in your program, rather than what you want to teach them. When a student graduates, the students should be able to demonstrate that the learning outcomes have been achieved. Therefore, learning outcomes should be written in such a way that they can actually be assessed. This also helps when having to explain what LAS is to those for whom LAS is still a new concept. Finally, the learning outcomes will guide the design of your programme, so ensure that the LAS specific aims and goals are included.
In the learning outcomes you will have established what you want your students to learn. The next step is determining how you are going to create conditions in which they can achieve these learning outcomes. You will probably already have ideas of how you want to teach, in addition to what you want to teach. These ideas will have to come together. A good starting point to address and assess all these practical issues is writing an educational philosophy for your program.
Educational philosophies explain how a teacher sees education, how they consider their own role in the teaching process, how they actually teach (see for example Chism, 1997). An educational philosophy for a program describes what learning and teaching are considered to be and how the programme plans to implement this. This statement can serve as a tool during the design process of the curriculum but also to organise those aspects that facilitate the learning process. Typical LAS skills and attitudes, for example citizenship or research skills, should obviously be included. Having a clear educational philosophy can also be helpful when talking to those in the university who are esponsible for those practical aspects as it helps to explain what the foundation of your programme is.
Questions to ask:
  • Have academic skills been placed at strategic points throughout the curriculum?
  • Are the Humanities, Social Sciences and Life or Natural Sciences included in the programme, i.e. is there a breadth requirement?
  • Are core courses contributing to general development of students?
  • Does the programme have a clear structure that enables students to achieve their best and offers them opportunities to make their own choices?
  • Are the specialisations designed within a coherent structure?
  • Are research skills trained, developed and evaluated at all levels?
  • Does the programme contain elements of citizenship education?
  • Is the programme not too strongly depended on one or two individual instructors?
  • Do you have a plan for evaluation, development and changes in the programme?
Before describing how you want to teach your programme, spend some time on defining how you, as designers of the program think that students learn. The recent European LAS programs have been designed with a wealth of theory available on this topic. When researching the current programmes you will find that many are directly or indirectly founded in the theory of Social Constructivism. This theory of knowledge maintains that human development is socially situated and that knowledge is constructed through interaction with others. In short: students learn from interaction with their teacher and peers.
The foundations for this theory were laid by Lev Vygotsky, a 19th century development psychologist who posed the theory that learning continues to build on previous learning and when instruction is available. The context for learning has to be relevant and multiple modes of learning are offered. Students take responsibility for their own learning and actively construct their own knowledge. LAS programmes usually have determined their own mode of teaching and their own context to encourage learning in students and include characteristics of this theory. The student is central to the learning process, for example in Problem Based Learning, small classes, close staff-student interaction, case studies or a combination.
Once you have determined how you conceptualize learning the next step is to describe how you want to facilitate this in teaching. Assuming you want to use the student-centred learning which works particularly well in a LAS programme, you now have to decide how you will implement this. The student and her or his learning are at the centre of the program and all decisions you take now are related to this aim.
There are various didactical approaches that you can use to achieve this aim. You will find that most European LAS programs do not use frontal lecturing for large groups of students. Rather they opt for smaller classrooms, between 12-25 students, in which interaction between teacher or instructor and students, and students among themselves is optimal. In small classes students have to be involved in their own learning, there is no hiding behind others as one can in a large group or even in an auditorium. In some cases, large-group lectures are complemented by small-group discussion which can also be an effective approach. Problem-based learning, as used e.g., by the University College Maastricht, is one didactical approach that can be used effectively to give students responsibility for their own learning. Through the seven-step procedure students analyse a case and while doing so, master the knowledge and skills set in the aims of the course. This way they learn in context and the supporters of this approach belief that it increases the learning gain.
Another approach is project-based learning where students work during the course students on a specific project: for example a business plan, a solar powered instrument or an annotated literature list. While working towards that end goal, the students have to find and understand specific knowledge in order to reach the goal: how to write a budget, how solar energy cells work or which schools of literary theory exist. Again, it is learning in context, but with a strong motivational goal attached.
It is not necessary to use a strict prescription of one didactical approach for your entire program. Often a variety of approaches suit best the aim of a specific course. There are numerous other ways in which students can be involved, motivated and responsible: class discussions in which students lead the discussions, reflections on reading materials, simulations, moot courts, lab sessions, smaller projects, presentations, even theatre productions in content classes can work. Depending on your learning outcomes and the learning outcomes of the courses in your program, you decide on the way you want to shape your teaching.
In order to safeguard coherence in the program the teaching conceptualization should be written down, shared and discussed regularly, making sure all teaching staff understand and support it. When planning your new programme, it is recommended to plan ample time for this and for training teaching staff if necessary.
Approaches taken by EPICUR partners:
Today's society is in a constant state of flux, and future leaders need to be flexible, creative thinkers, able to cope with the complexity of the issues facing the world. That is why Amsterdam University College (AUC) offers a liberal arts and sciences program to prepare you for this.
In addition to factual knowledge, a liberal arts and sciences education prepares you to become a multilingual, informed and engaged global citizen with well-developed intercultural competencies that enable you to read intelligently, think critically and write effectively on the processes shaping our world. 
Learning objectives: 
  • a deep knowledge base in the chosen field of study. This depth is to be found in the understanding of the knowledge domain and in the ability to apply concepts, and not only in the accumulation of facts
  • knowledge of and the ability to apply the most prominent theories and methodological foundations of the chosen field of study
  • understanding of the broader context in which the research issues of the chosen field of study are positioned
  • breadth of knowledge, as demonstrated by a (general) knowledge of the physical and natural world, a (general) knowledge of European and world histories, philosophical traditions, major religions, and cultural life worlds and an understanding of economic forces and political dynamics
  • highly developed cognitive, analytic and problem-solving skills
  • the capacity for independent critical thought, rational inquiry and self-directed learning
  • the ability to work, independently and collaboratively, on research projects that require the integration of knowledge with skills in analysis, discovery, problem-solving, and communication mathematical skills
  • mathematical skills
  • familiarity with the general scientific method
  • second-language competence
  • the ability to engage with socio-cultural frameworks and traditions other than their own
  • the ability to plan work and to use time effectively
  • be able to evaluate which disciplines are involved in the solution of complex issues
  • be able to assess which research methods are most suitable in a particular situation
  • be able to integrate the content and research methods from disciplines relevant to a particular situation
  • be able to defend a well-considered viewpoint covering the relevant disciplines
  • know which phenomena are being studied in the different disciplines and which research methods and theories are used
  • know how to obtain and evaluate information
  • can orient themselves on a new knowledge domain, formulate an overview and determine their knowledge gaps
  • express themselves well verbally and at an academic level in writing
  • present ideas clearly and effectively
  • communicate knowledge to a public consisting of specialists or laypersons, making use of various modes of communication
  • use knowledge of cultures in explaining current problems in society
  • understand and appreciate cultural differences, not only at a distance, but in real life
  • live with different value systems in daily life, and reflect on their own value systems
  • demonstrate an international awareness and openness to the world, based on understanding and appreciation of social and cultural diversity and respect for individual human rights and dignity
  • profound respect for truth and intellectual integrity, and for the ethics of scholarship
  • intellectual curiosity and creativity, including understanding of the philosophical and methodological bases of research activity
  • an openness to new ideas and unconventional critiques of received wisdom
  • leadership skills, including a willingness to engage in constructive public discourse, to accept social and civic responsibilities and to speak out against prejudice, injustice and the abuse of power
LAS education at UCF is a process of intellectual discovery and personal development. Students learn about the human and the non-human worlds, systematically develop their capacity for high-level academic work in exchange with others, and gradually unfold their interests and abilities in ways suited to their aspirations. We encourage students to critically reflect on science and knowledge and to become skilled communicators and creative shapers of their environment.
The following teaching and learning principles guide our work at UCF:
Integrating freedom and structure:  
The LAS program is set in a challenging and dynamic learning environment in which students can shape their own academic path within a structured set of possibilities. In comparison to one-size-fits-all programs, LAS offers more room for choice and self-directed learning. At the same time, students develop shared knowledge and skills in the compulsory Core and Major courses. This integration of freedom and structure distinguishes LAS in Freiburg from ­­less structured LAS programs. We aim to develop students' ability for rigorous academic inquiry and allow them to develop and follow their intellectual curiosity. 
Crossing disciplinary boundaries:  
Right from the start, students learn about the practices and traditions of academic disciplines. They learn how knowledge is generated in the natural and social sciences and in the humanities. Supported by courses that reflect on knowledge and science, this exposure to academic diversity sharpens students' independent thinking and raises awareness for disciplinary blind spots as well as possibilities of interdisciplinary collaboration. With this foundation and further exchanges across disciplinary boundaries throughout their studies, students learn to deal with complex interdisciplinary issues in both research and professional practice. 
Creating a learning community:  
Bringing the right people together and creating spaces for stimulating exchange of ideas and knowledge is the key to academic learning and personal development. LAS brings together students and lecturers from a variety of academic and cultural backgrounds and with a wide range of interests. We share intellectual openness and the willingness learn and develop. This spirit and the College atmosphere provide an inspiring environment for learning and knowledge creation in and beyond the classroom. 
Mixing teaching methods:
Due to the broad range of academic topics and disciplines covered in the LAS program and as people have different learning styles, we apply a variety of teaching methods – from seminars to lectures, from real-world projects and excursions to research-based learning. In general, courses are rather small-scale and adaptable to the students' learning process.
Multilingualism as added value: 
English is the language of instruction and default for communication at UCF. And yet, multilingualism is crucial for international communication and for academic and professional mobility. As part of the LAS program, all students learn to communicate on academic topics in excellent English and develop skills in another foreign language. Students who do not speak German are required to learn German to gain access to the city and University of Freiburg as well as to the rich German traditions in the sciences and humanities. 

Last edited: 26. Oct 2022, 14:17, Hutz-Nierhoff, Dorthe [dh1076@rz.uni-freiburg.de]